For anyone who has been asked whether they need a PAM tool when they already pay for Entra ID P2: what IAM, PAM and PIM each cover, where Microsoft's PIM stops, and what's left standing in a hybrid tenant or across an MSP's clients.
IAM (identity and access management) governs every identity and what it can reach. PAM (privileged access management) is the part of IAM that controls the accounts that can change systems: finding them, storing and rotating their credentials, granting them only when needed and logging their use. PIM (privileged identity management) makes privileged roles eligible instead of permanent. In a Microsoft shop, PIM usually means a product, Microsoft Entra PIM, and it does that job for Microsoft cloud roles only.
How this page was made: every Microsoft statement is quoted from Microsoft Learn or Partner Center, checked on 21 October 2026 and linked at the end. CyberQP makes Panthera, a privileged access management platform; where it fits is stated in one section, near the end.
The three overlap, so the clearest way to separate them is by the question each one answers.
NIST defines a privileged user as one "authorized (and therefore, trusted) to perform security-relevant functions that ordinary users are not authorized to perform". PAM covers those users and the accounts they use; IAM covers everyone.
It does part of PAM's job, for part of the estate. Microsoft describes PIM as a service to "manage, control, and monitor access" to "resources in Microsoft Entra ID, Azure, and other Microsoft Online Services such as Microsoft 365 or Microsoft Intune". Inside that scope it is good: just-in-time activation, time-bound assignments, approval, MFA on activation, justification, notifications, access reviews and audit history.
Outside that scope it has nothing to manage. PIM controls who holds a role; it doesn't store or rotate the password of the account that holds it, and it doesn't reach systems that aren't Microsoft cloud services.
Each line below comes from Microsoft's own documentation, or from what that documentation leaves out of scope.
For an organization that is fully cloud, Microsoft-only and passwordless, Entra PIM may be most of what it needs. Most mid-market tenants still have an on-premises domain, a few service accounts and local admin accounts on every machine.
An MSP reaches client tenants through GDAP (granular delegated admin privileges), which Microsoft says gives partners "least-privileged access following the Zero Trust cybersecurity protocol" with "granular and time-bound access" to customers' workloads. The Partner Center page doesn't mention PIM, and there's a limit of 100 security groups per customer.
The best native setup combines the two: technician security groups in the partner tenant, made eligible through PIM for Groups, assigned to each client's GDAP relationship, and activated with MFA and a justification when a technician needs them. T-Minus365's write-up walks through it and notes the PIM license needed in the partner tenant. It is worth doing, and it makes Microsoft role access just-in-time across every client.
What it leaves standing on each client:
Zero standing privilege takes eight phases, walked through in zero standing privilege: the PAM journey for MSPs. Here is where Entra PIM does the work and where it doesn't.
Read it as three phases PIM handles well for Microsoft cloud roles, two it covers only for Entra roles, and three it leaves to something else.
Keep Entra PIM for Microsoft cloud roles if you already pay for P2; it does that job well and it's built into the tenant. Put everything PIM can't see under a PAM platform: the discovery across every source, the credentials, the endpoints and the non-Microsoft systems. The question to ask any PAM vendor is what it covers that PIM doesn't, and for an MSP, whether it does that for each client separately.
That's the gap Panthera is built for:
Partly. Entra PIM handles just-in-time access, approvals, MFA on activation and audit history for roles in Entra ID, Azure and other Microsoft Online Services. It doesn't vault or rotate credentials, and it doesn't cover local Windows accounts, on-premises Active Directory or non-Microsoft systems, which a PAM platform does.
Yes, or Entra ID Governance. Microsoft says you need either license "to use PIM and all of its settings".
No. PIM manages Microsoft cloud roles and Entra groups, and Microsoft excludes groups synchronized from on-premises. Local administrator accounts need Windows LAPS, Intune Endpoint Privilege Management or a PAM platform.
Yes, through PIM for Groups: technician groups in the partner tenant are made eligible and assigned to each client's GDAP relationship, then activated when needed. It covers Microsoft roles only.
Yes. IAM covers every identity; PAM is the part of it that controls privileged accounts and their credentials, and PIM is one control within PAM.
Sources (checked 21 October 2026): Microsoft Learn, What is Microsoft Entra Privileged Identity Management? (updated 23 April 2026); Microsoft Learn, Privileged Identity Management for Groups (updated 23 April 2026); Microsoft Learn, Microsoft Entra ID Governance licensing fundamentals (updated 16 October 2026); Microsoft Partner Center, Introduction to granular delegated admin privileges (updated 28 April 2026); NIST CSRC glossary, privileged user (SP 800-53 Rev. 5); Microsoft Learn, Endpoint Privilege Management; T-Minus365, Secure your GDAP access with just-in-time permissions (11 December 2025).
Related: zero standing privilege for MSPs, just-in-time admin access for MSP technicians, how to remove local admin rights, Windows LAPS vs a PAM platform, Panthera free trial, book a demo.